puff

"One of my favourite Australian writers of his generation, David Free has the rare gift of writing critical prose with a creative dimension. Whether talking about high culture, popular culture or both at once, he is the master of the line of argument that makes you hungry for what happens next. Such a knack for turning the process of thought into a dramatic narrative is given to few, but he not only has it, he seems determined to develop it to the limit. His plain, natural but invariably melodic style combines appreciation and judgment in an addictive blend, the appreciation deep and wide-ranging, the judgment precise and sane. His powers of illustration leave most poets and novelists sounding short of skill, and how they leave most other critics sounding it would be impolite for me to mention. Enough to say that he is many furrows ahead in his field." — Clive James
Contact: freenetmail[at]yahoo.com

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Donald Trump Cures Autism. Again.

IS THERE ANYTHING THE MAN CAN'T DO?

I’ve said some harsh things about Donald Trump in the past. But I like to think of myself as a fair-minded person, and I’m always willing to give credit where it’s due. So when Trump kicks a massive goal for humanity, I think it’s incumbent on all of us – including those of us who believe he’s generally a reckless and destructive dickhead – to step back and applaud his good work.

In this spirit, I want to commend Trump for curing autism last Monday. I use the word “cure” in its fullest sense here. Trump hasn’t just identified a medication that can be used, in his view, to treat existing cases of autism. He has discovered the root cause of the whole autism epidemic.

He announced these breakthroughs at a press conference last week. Technically, the purpose of the press conference was to announce changes to FDA advice about two medications: leucovorin, a form of Vitamin B commonly used to treat cancer patients; and the painkiller acetaminophen, marketed in the U.S. as Tylenol, and known in other parts of the world as paracetamol. From now on, FDA labeling on leucovorin will endorse its use as a treatment for people with autism. And labeling on Tylenol will caution pregnant women against taking the drug, because of its possible (or perhaps definite) links to autism.

Let’s not downplay the magnitude of the breakthroughs Trump has made here. For decades, medical scientists have laboured in vain to determine the causes of autism. For decades, we have imagined that if the case is ever cracked, it will be cracked by someone with long experience in the field – or, failing that, even short experience in the field; someone with medical credentials, a rigorous commitment to scientific methods and ethics, and at least a vague idea of what the fuck they are talking about.

It turns out we have been looking in the wrong direction. When the answer to the autism question finally came, it was delivered by a man with no scientific or medical qualifications whatsoever. And the answer wasn’t boring or hard to understand, as so many medical explanations are. It was amazingly simple. Tylenol causes autism. Taking Tylenol is not good.

Of course, Trump put it in a far more nuanced and eloquent way than that. No. Wait. He put it exactly like that.“Taking Tylenol is not good,” he said at his press conference. “I’ll say it. It’s not good" ...

My full tribute to Donald Trump's sensational medical breakthrough can be read for free over at my Substack page – click here to read it. Substack is the new online home for all my writing. If you like my stuff, check out my archive there and hit the "Subscribe" button for weekly updates. It's all free

Monday, September 22, 2025

Cocksure Codswallop

JOE ROGAN AND TRUMPIAN CONSPIRACY THEORY 

How do conspiracy theories end? With a bang or with a whimper?

That’s a trick question, of course. Conspiracy theories never end. They just go on and on. They can’t be killed off by a cleansing counterblast of reason and fact, because they’re not grounded in reason or fact in the first place. They’re ahistorical fantasies that can withstand any amount of falsification.

Take the case of the Kennedy assassination. A few months ago, I wrote about the Trump administration’s release of the final batch of still-classified government files about the case. As I noted at the time, the unsealing of those files ended up being a fizzer, objectively speaking. It revealed nothing substantial about the assassination that we didn’t already know. The last great hope of the Kennedy conspiracists – the hope that the hidden truth about the assassination would be found in some long-buried government file – was extinguished. Donald Trump didn’t set out, of course, to deal a death blow to Kennedy conspiracy theory. But that’s what he wound up doing.

For a while I’ve been considering writing a sequel to that piece. I’ve been waiting to see when (or if) the other shoe would drop. I’ve been waiting to see if Trump, or anyone in his administration, would admit that the declassification exercise didn’t deliver the explosive revelations that certain haggard conspiracists had expected from it. I’ve been waiting to see if anyone in the press would remind Trump of the big windy promises he made before it began.
 
Those promises were pretty grand. “When I return to the White House I will declassify and unseal all JFK assassination related documents,” Trump announced on the campaign trail in 2023. “It’s been 60 years, time for the American people to know the TRUTH!” ...

The rest of this piece is available over at my Substack. Click here to read it. Substack is the new online home for all my writing. If you like my stuff, check out my archive there and hit the "Subscribe" button. It's all free.  


Monday, August 11, 2025

Money for Cotton, Blood for Oil

GORE VIDAL REVIEWS SOME UNDERPANTS

Hi Gore, Thanks again for shopping with us! We’ve noticed that you haven’t left a review for your purchase of 5-pack Hipster Briefs (Medium), which you ordered from us on 6/5/25. Please take a moment to answer a few questions about your buying experience. Your feedback is important to us!

Was the item as described? The item (items?) was (were?) described as a five-pack of hipster briefs. It (they?) proved, on receipt, to be nothing less (also, alas, nothing more) than a five-pack of hipster briefs. To double-check this eerie coincidence, I have counted the briefs again. Again, I find that the tally comes to five. Astoundingly, not a single pair appears to have seized its chance to escape, during transit, the surly bonds of the pre-paid satchel. Nor did the entire five-pack metamorphose, en route, into some entirely different object (a soccer ball? some soil? an actual hipster?). Item as described? Oui, as Bouvard might have said to Pécuchet. But does this feat really call for written comment (unpaid) from me, not to mention the awarding of multiple stars? Apparently, as the sun sets on the age of American efficiency, the answer is yes. 

While it’s still fresh on your mind, how would you rate your overall buying experience? This question is not at all bad, except as prose ...

The remainder of Vidal's scathing takedown is over at my Substack page. Click here to read the whole thing. Substack is the new home of all my online writing. Browse the archive there, and click the "Subscribe" button for weekly updates. It's all free.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Substacking

My main online home is now over at Substack. If you like the stuff I do elsewhere (in papers like the Herald and Age, or in my podcast Ghosts of Dallas) you can stay abreast of my new work on the Substack page. And if you like what you see there, you can hit the "Subscribe" button to get a free weekly article delivered to your Inbox.