So far, Poole’s book stands as the leading work of the anti-food backlash. It is brisk, well-written, and entertaining. It’s also, I think, mostly out of order. Of course, a polemicist is not obliged to be even-handed: only provocative and lively. Poole is certainly both of those things. But one is entitled to disagree with his findings ... [read more]
DavidFree.net
Essays, articles and reviews by David Free
puff
"One of my favourite Australian writers of his generation, David Free has the rare gift of writing critical prose with a creative dimension. Whether talking about high culture, popular culture or both at once, he is the master of the line of argument that makes you hungry for what happens next. Such a knack for turning the process of thought into a dramatic narrative is given to few, but he not only has it, he seems determined to develop it to the limit. His plain, natural but invariably melodic style combines appreciation and judgment in an addictive blend, the appreciation deep and wide-ranging, the judgment precise and sane. His powers of illustration leave most poets and novelists sounding short of skill, and how they leave most other critics sounding it would be impolite for me to mention. Enough to say that he is many furrows ahead in his field." — Clive James
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Baloney
“Western industrial civilization,” says the British critic Steven Poole, “is eating itself stupid.” Poole’s recent polemic against food culture, You Aren’t What You Eat, has had a sympathetic reception. Apparently Poole isn’t the only person who’s had a gutful of the food craze. Indeed, putting the boot into foodies is rapidly becoming a craze in its own right. Over Christmas, the novelist Will Self chimed in with an article urging Britons to make a New Year’s resolution to “throw up our very obsession with food itself.” Foodies have had a good run for a while now. But one detects signs that the great feast might be coming to an end. The critics are circling the table like waiters who want you gone. They’re clearing away chairs with increasing impertinence. One senses it might be time to call for the bill.
So far, Poole’s book stands as the leading work of the anti-food backlash. It is brisk, well-written, and entertaining. It’s also, I think, mostly out of order. Of course, a polemicist is not obliged to be even-handed: only provocative and lively. Poole is certainly both of those things. But one is entitled to disagree with his findings ... [read more]
So far, Poole’s book stands as the leading work of the anti-food backlash. It is brisk, well-written, and entertaining. It’s also, I think, mostly out of order. Of course, a polemicist is not obliged to be even-handed: only provocative and lively. Poole is certainly both of those things. But one is entitled to disagree with his findings ... [read more]
Friday, January 18, 2013
The Beatles of Comedy
Monty Python's Flying Circus Complete and Annotated edited by Luke Dempsey
In 1968, a group of young English comedians made a TV special called How to Irritate People. Pitched for the U.S. market, the show was meant to get Americans excited about a new wave of British comedy. It failed in that aim, but one of its sketches retains high interest for the archaeologist of humor. Written by a couple of Cambridge graduates named John Cleese and Graham Chapman, the sketch is set in the workshop of a shady car salesman. A disgruntled customer, played by Chapman, returns his new car and registers a few complaints: The gear lever is loose. The brakes don’t work. Before the sketch is over, the vehicle’s doors have fallen off ... [read more]
In 1968, a group of young English comedians made a TV special called How to Irritate People. Pitched for the U.S. market, the show was meant to get Americans excited about a new wave of British comedy. It failed in that aim, but one of its sketches retains high interest for the archaeologist of humor. Written by a couple of Cambridge graduates named John Cleese and Graham Chapman, the sketch is set in the workshop of a shady car salesman. A disgruntled customer, played by Chapman, returns his new car and registers a few complaints: The gear lever is loose. The brakes don’t work. Before the sketch is over, the vehicle’s doors have fallen off ... [read more]
Forty-four candles
The Longest Way Home by Andrew McCarthy
When it Happens to You by Molly Ringwald
The 1980s were the golden age of almost nothing. But to give
the decade its due, it was a good time for teen movies. In the early part of
the decade, the actors Andrew McCarthy and Molly Ringwald were giants of the
genre. Both were members of the Brat Pack, which also included the likes of Rob
Lowe and Demi Moore. But unlike the more trivially good-looking members of that
troupe, McCarthy and Ringwald had character. McCarthy was sensitive and exceedingly
wide-eyed: he looked like a bush baby with a mullet. Ringwald was famous for
her red hair, lush lips, and willowy frame.
Depressingly for those of us who grew up with them, both actors are now irrefutably middle-aged. McCarthy is 50, Ringwald 44 ... [read more]
When it Happens to You by Molly Ringwald
The 1980s were the golden age of almost nothing. But to give
the decade its due, it was a good time for teen movies. In the early part of
the decade, the actors Andrew McCarthy and Molly Ringwald were giants of the
genre. Both were members of the Brat Pack, which also included the likes of Rob
Lowe and Demi Moore. But unlike the more trivially good-looking members of that
troupe, McCarthy and Ringwald had character. McCarthy was sensitive and exceedingly
wide-eyed: he looked like a bush baby with a mullet. Ringwald was famous for
her red hair, lush lips, and willowy frame. Depressingly for those of us who grew up with them, both actors are now irrefutably middle-aged. McCarthy is 50, Ringwald 44 ... [read more]
Monday, November 26, 2012
Winning serve
Both Flesh and Not by David Foster Wallace
It’s
been four years since the American novelist David Foster Wallace took his own
life at the age of 46. The Wallace industry has been busier since his death than
it ever was while he lived. In 2009 it gave us This is Water, a padded-out version of a graduation address he
delivered in 2005. His undergraduate Philosophy thesis was published in 2010.
In 2011 we had his big posthumous novel, the characteristically brilliant but annoying
The Pale King. D. T. Max’s biography,
Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, came
out earlier this year.
Now we have Both Flesh and Not, a compilation of Wallace’s uncollected non-fiction. Mark that word “uncollected.” Wallace published two books of essays during his lifetime: A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again (1997) and Consider the Lobster (2005). The bulk of this new book consists of early essays that Wallace chose not to reprint in those volumes. In almost every case it isn’t hard to see why ... [read more]
It’s
been four years since the American novelist David Foster Wallace took his own
life at the age of 46. The Wallace industry has been busier since his death than
it ever was while he lived. In 2009 it gave us This is Water, a padded-out version of a graduation address he
delivered in 2005. His undergraduate Philosophy thesis was published in 2010.
In 2011 we had his big posthumous novel, the characteristically brilliant but annoying
The Pale King. D. T. Max’s biography,
Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, came
out earlier this year. Now we have Both Flesh and Not, a compilation of Wallace’s uncollected non-fiction. Mark that word “uncollected.” Wallace published two books of essays during his lifetime: A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again (1997) and Consider the Lobster (2005). The bulk of this new book consists of early essays that Wallace chose not to reprint in those volumes. In almost every case it isn’t hard to see why ... [read more]
Labels:
David Foster Wallace,
essays,
literature,
non-fiction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
